There are gaps in your cyber security, and they are not where you think they are, claims our expert Hannu Saarenpää. No doubt you have invested in all the required protection elements, and everything should be just fine. But when an attack happens, the defenses may fail, system crashes and services go down.
Why does this happen? Especially in large networks, there are different specialists contributing to building the system at different times, which may lead to gaps. Software updates may be lagging. Most importantly, the world evolves fast and so do the hackers.
How can this be avoided? What can be improved? The answer is to test your network when it is actually operational. Cyber security can be tested, gaps can be found and removed with a controlled version of a real attack on an operational network. The following example shows how unexpected gaps were found, and how fixing them will not only lead to stronger security but also improved capacity.
An attack against an operator’s network had knocked down the defense systems. We suggested testing the operational network, to find out what had caused the crash. The time was set at night, during the least amount of traffic. Our equipment was set up, experts from both parties were there and a good amount of coffee was available. The cyber security stress test was ready to start.
Together we selected Top5 priority DDoS scenarios to be run against the system. We agreed to drive each scenario at a load level steps of 20%, 40%, 60%, 80% and 100%. Each sprint would take a few minutes, allowing us to get a clear picture of how the network would react to the attack load. We monitored various components in the network, CPU load, memory consumption, the number of transmitted and received packets, alarms, stateful message responses, etc.
As the load started to grow, the network operation became unstable, but the alarm systems did not indicate it. The first problems began already at 30-40% load levels, marked in the graph. We observed that the network alarm system was not indicating the problem and that there were clear individual bottlenecks in the network. We also observed some peculiar packet drops, memory leaks, and a significant performance slow down during the test run. In an extreme example, network performance was worse using a 40% load than 80% load.
|The result of the test were two important findings, namely, that the alarm configuration did not alert the attack early enough and that a bottleneck was limiting the capacity. Reconfiguring the alarm system will increase the security before the next attack. The bottleneck was found in an unexpected place. Although it was not the main cause of the crash, it was limiting network performance. By fixing this individual bottleneck, the network capacity could be doubled with a minimal cost. As a summary, the stress testing provided tangible results on how to build up the security and provided a view on capacity bottlenecks as well.||
Testing security defences
Testing the security alarm system
Finding capacity bottlenecks
Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks are digital network attacks that block on-line services by sending huge amounts of traffic from multiple sources. Such attacks often originate from a group of hijacked devices, called "botnets". The primary purpose of the attacks is to knock down the hosting server and make it unavailable to legitimate users. As the hosting server is more vulnerable during an attack, DDoS attacks are used to enable information theft. According to various studies, more than 2 000 DDoS attacks happen globally on a daily basis and cause shutdowns in up to one-third of the affected networks. Systems typically take hours or even days, even weeks to recover from an attack. Recovery time depends on the extent and complexity of the attack.
Network/service bandwidth congestion, where the service receives a huge amount of connection requests. As a result, all applications and services in the target system are unusable.
Protocol attacks aim to saturate the resources of open networks by sending requests such as ping of death. These attacks manipulate the IP protocol by sending large IP fragments, which results in a reboot or service crash.
The attack aims to desynchronize the application-layer states, which exhausts the resources of the target system. The memory is consumed, the CPU is loaded, and the resources are depleted. In the end, the target system is completely stuck and will typically crash in the end.